Application of 3D printing technology for pre

Jun 05, 2023

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 1671 (2023) Cite this article

1075 Accesses

10 Altmetric

Metrics details

To investigate usefulness of 3D printing for preoperative evaluations, student and resident education, and communication with parents or guardians of patients with pediatric retroperitoneal tumors. Ten patients planning retroperitoneal tumor resection between March and November 2019 were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were used for 3D reconstruction and printing. Surveyed items were understanding of preoperative lesions with 3 different modules (CT, 3D reconstruction, and 3D printing) by students, residents, and specialists; satisfaction of specialists; and comprehension by guardians after preoperative explanations with each module. The median age at operation was 4.2 years (range, 1.8–18.1), and 8 patients were diagnosed with neuroblastoma. The 3D printing was the most understandable module for all groups (for students, residents, and specialists, P = 0.002, 0.027, 0.013, respectively). No significant intraoperative adverse events or immediate postoperative complications occurred. All specialists stated that 3D printing enhanced their understanding of cases. Guardians answered that 3D printing were the easiest to comprehend among the 3 modules (P = 0.007). Use of 3D printing in treatment of pediatric patients with retroperitoneal tumors was useful for preoperative planning, education, and parental explaining with obtaining informed consents.

3D printing has expanded its medical applications in a variety of fields, including education, preoperative treatment planning, and custom instrumentation1. In application for pediatric patients, 3D printing has been mainly used to plan treatments for congenital diseases2,3,4. Use of 3D printing prior to resection of a complex pediatric abdominal tumors could be helpful for surgical treatment without complications5. However, the application development is still at an early stage, and few studies have been conducted using pediatric patient models6,7.

Tumors in a child's retroperitoneal cavity, especially in the cases of neuroblastoma, invade the surrounding structures, which is unexpected from pre-operative 2-dimensional abdominal computed tomography (CT)8,9. Pediatric surgeons have wanted to develop 3-dimentional tools for better surgical planning for this reason, which could result in better surgical outcomes by avoiding incomplete excisions or unexpected vascular injury5,6,7,8. It is also difficult for medical students and surgical residents to understand the anatomical location of the retroperitoneal tumors and how they should be operated on10. Therefore, there has been a demand for tools for intuitively visualizing and teaching anatomical structures. 3D printing can be applied to meet these needs because utilization of 3D printing in anatomical education could be a bridge of the large gap in experience by improving spatial comprehension of complex anatomy topics in a format that is widely accessible to most audiences11. In addition, caregivers are even less likely to understand lesions and surgery when they are explained by two-dimensional imaging alone12,13.

We performed 3D printing prior to pediatric retroperitoneal tumor resection to determine whether 3D printed models are helpful for preoperative planning by pediatric surgeons, education of students and surgical residents, and parental explanations during acquisitions of informed consent.

Patients under 18 years of age who underwent retroperitoneal tumor resection at Seoul National University Children’s Hospital from March to November in 2019 were included. This study was conducted after obtaining consents from the participants. Patients who did not agree to participate in the study were excluded. We received approval for the study from Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH)’s Institutional Review Board (No. 2003-135-1110). This research was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants’ parents or legal guardians.

Imaging modules for study were prepared as follows; Enrolled patients underwent abdominal CT imaging routinely for preoperative planning. 3D reconstruction images were created based on the recent CT images, and 3D printed models were made based on them.

In order to investigate the understanding of the lesions for preoperative planning, 3 groups of 3rd grade medical students (N = 30, N = 10 for each module), residents (N = 30, N = 10 for each module), and certified pediatric surgeons (N = 5) reviewed lesions and major structures for each patient using 2D CT, 3D reconstruction, and 3D printing modules (Table 1). For each patients, three participants in each group were assigned to each module independently for evaluation. Margin of the mass, location of the structures, easiness of identification and degree of satisfaction were evaluated on a 0 to 5 point scale, with 0 meaning poor and 5 meaning excellent. After an evaluation of comprehension, the results of each participant group were compared among modules. In addition, we also investigated the opinions of the pediatric surgeons actually performing the surgeries, the difficulty of finding the structure in the actual surgical field using the three modules, and the overall satisfaction with 3D printed models. In addition, in order to confirm the understanding of the caregivers, the lesions were explained before the surgery by 2D CT, 3D reconstruction, and 3D printing in succession, and the understanding added to previous modules was checked. The survey items are summarized in Table 2.

In addition, we checked the operation time, estimated blood loss, number of adverse events during surgery, and complication and mortality occurring within 2 weeks after surgery.

Preoperative CT imaging with slice thickness of 3 mm is performed and sent to Medical IP©, a 3D printing agency. Medical IP© uses MEDIP software platform (http://medicalip.com/Medip, MEDICAL IP©, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for medical image processing, which applies machine learning-based thresholds, region growing, and graph-cut algorithms (Supplementary Figure). The graph-cut algorithm is an algorithm that separates the foreground from the background by configuring each pixel with graph intersections (nodes) and utilizing the difference in energy (flow network) between them14. In order to reconstruct CT images in three dimensions, segmentation of each organ is performed and verified by pediatric radiologists to confirm their adequacy. The platform is equipped with a security device for protecting personal information, so that researchers related to image handling can check and feedback only through the 3D viewing platform through a security pledge process.

After confirming the 3D reconstructed image and reviewing the medical information by the clinicians, the 3D printing model was manufactured. Models were produced on a 1:1 scale, and printed with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) copolymers (400–500 g per case) and resin (800–1200 g per case) by the Polyjet method (J750 [Stratasys; 7665 Commerce Way Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA]). The 3D printing model was completed at least 3 days before surgery, allowing the medical staff to identify the case and use it for explanations to the caregiver (Fig. 1).

Computed tomography scan of a 4-year-old male patient with neuroblastoma (a), 3D reconstruction (b), and 3D printed model.

Categorical variables are presented as percentages. Comparisons between categorical variables of three groups were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis due to the non-parametric nature of the data followed by the post hoc Bonferroni Correction. Continuous variables are reported as the median with range or the mean ± standard deviation. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant in Kruskal–Wallis test and < 0.0167 in the post hoc analysis. The IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 statistical software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for all statistical analysis.

Ten patients were included during the study, 8 of which were boys. Median age was 4.1 (range, 1.8–18.1) years and mass size was 2.1 (range, 1.0–10.9) cm. Eight of the ten patients were diagnosed with neuroblastoma. There were no unexpected injury or amputation of blood vessels and ureters during surgery, and there was no post-operative of complications and mortality (Table 3). The demographic and operation-related information of each patient is listed in the Table 4.

In all 3 groups (students, residents, and certified pediatric surgeons), the understanding of lesions using 3D printed models was the highest, and the comprehension was lowest using CT, which was statistically significant in each group (P = 0.005, 0.027, 0.013, respectively) (Fig. 2, Table 5). Post hoc analysis found statistical differences between CT vs 3D reconstruction and CT vs 3D printing (P < 0.001 for each), and no difference between 3D reconstruction and 3D printing in all three groups.

The understanding of lesions using computed tomography, 3D reconstruction and 3D printed models by each group.

When the students performed pre-operative evaluation through CT, 6 out of 10 did not indicate the mass margin at all in the comprehension question. Only 2 were able to indicate the flow of ureter and renal artery/vein more than 50%. In the case of using 3D reconstruction, 7 out of 10 patients indicated a mass margin of 50% or more, and this number increased to 9 in 3D printing. When 3D reconstruction and 3D printing were used, 5 and 8 patients displayed more than 50% of renal vessels, respectively. A similar trend was also observed in residents. In the pediatric surgeon group, even when only CT was used, margin of the mass was recognized by more than 50% in 6 cases. The number increased when 3D reconstruction and 3D printing were used as in the case of students and residents, and similarly observed for blood vessel recognition.

Only the certified pediatric surgeons evaluated the difference between each module and the actual surgical field; it was found that it was the easiest to identify the field through 3D printed models and it was statistically significant (P = 0.018). In the comparison between each group, there was no significant difference between CT and 3D reconstruction, 3D reconstruction and 3D printing, and only CT and 3D printing showed a significant difference (P = 0.005). Overall satisfaction with the 3D printing module was found to be 4.3(± 0.3) out of 5 points (Table 6).

Two out of 10 caregivers were male; 7 of them were in their 30 s. Nine of them had a higher education than being college graduates (Table 7). The comprehension by the guardians was measured after using CT only, CT and 3D reconstruction, and all three modules including 3D printing, and their understanding scores were 2.71(± 1.25), 4.29(± 0.95), and 4.86(± 0.38) out of 5, respectively, with P value as 0.007.

This study was the first case series to prospectively apply 3D printing to treatment of pediatric tumor patients. Preoperative planning using 3D printed models increased the operator's satisfaction and adverse events during surgery occurred only in very few cases. Its use in educating students and residents was found to be highly effective, and the satisfaction of treatment was improved by better understanding when acquiring pre-operational consent for guardians.

A study of preoperative planning, with a simple choledochal cyst model using polymer powders, reported that 3D printing could be useful for preoperative simulation2. In patients needing complex surgery, preoperative planning using 3D printing takes less time and has better accuracy for identifying structures than CT or 3D reconstruction15. In a study by Krauel et al.5, who performed 3D printing on 3 pediatric oncologic cases, the use of 3D printing could improve pre-tumor planning in a variety of fields by increasing the extent and safety of resection. In our study, as in previous studies, unexpected events during surgery and postoperative complications were not observed. It's not entirely due to the help of 3D printing, but being able to get more information when planning preoperatively may be one of the reasons why it has fewer adverse outcomes. In particular, this was also observed by the records of patients 4 and 10. They had excisions of intra-abdominal metastatic lymph nodes of various locations such as para-duodenal, para-aortic, retrorenal and portocaval areas and recorded a lower-than-average expected blood loss despite a higher risk of damage to nearby blood vessels due to previous operations and the location of the lymph nodes. This could be inferred from the operator's high satisfaction with the preoperative evaluation.

Several studies have reported the results of using 3D printing in the education of students and residents. A recent study reported on 3D printing models with a variety of colors to replace the anatomy education with cadaveres16,17, and 3D-printed liver was reported to be more efficient than a traditional atlas in anatomy education18. In education of pathologic models of aortic aneurysm and cancers, 3D printing was useful for surgical education from the survey results19. Hojo et al.20 reported a model of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for training purposes, and showed that 3D printing was superior to textbooks for learning pelvic anatomy. In a recently reported meta-analysis, it was reported that education using 3D printing was more helpful in improving students' understanding11. In our study, students and residents compared 2D CT, 3D reconstruction, and 3D printing for understanding retroperitoneal tumors. Similar to previous studies, the 3D printing enabled the highest level of understanding.

Personalized 3D printing has the potential to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for surgical resection in patients suspected of having stage I lung cancer13. Yang et al.12 also reported the using 3D printed liver models improved parental education regarding the understanding of liver anatomy and physiology, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure, and associated surgical risks. As reported in the previous studies, we found that the informed consent obtained using 3D printed models in addition to the conventional 2D CT images improved the understanding and satisfaction of the caregivers in the management of retroperitoneal mass resection.

This study is an initial pilot study involving only 10 patients with retroperitoneal tumors, and has a limitation in that it has a small number of case series. More patients need to be enrolled for evaluation of the roles of 3D printing in the management of pediatric patients. In our report, the accuracy of 3D printing was good enough that operators reported high satisfaction with the 3D printing models, but more attention should be paid to avoid possible deviations as warned in Martelli et al.'s review paper21. In the future, our center will conduct 3D printing of various pediatric congenital diseases, as well as retroperitoneal tumors for preoperative planning, to verify the effectiveness in educating students in normal and pathologic anatomy.

The use of 3D printing in pediatric patients with retroperitoneal tumors can improve the understanding of pediatric surgeons. Education with 3D printing was helpful for understanding the lesion by students and residents; it also helped guardians to comprehend better in informed consents.

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Pietrabissa, A. et al. An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery. Surg. Endosc. 34, 1–13 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Burdall, O. C., Makin, E., Davenport, M. & Ade-Ajayi, N. 3D printing to simulate laparoscopic choledochal surgery. J. Pediatr. Surg. 51, 828–831 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Ahn, J. J. et al. Use of 3D reconstruction cloacagrams and 3D printing in cloacal malformations. J. Pediatr. Urol. 13(395), e1-395.e6 (2017).

Google Scholar

Gasior, A. C. et al. Transcending dimensions: A comparative analysis of cloaca imaging in advancing the surgeon’s understanding of complex anatomy. J. Digit. Imaging 32, 761–765 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Krauel, L. et al. Use of 3D prototypes for complex surgical oncologic cases. World. J. Surg. 40, 889–894 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Yang, T. et al. Impact of 3D printing technology on comprehension of surgical anatomy of retroperitoneal tumor. World J. Surg. 42, 2339–2343 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Mühling, J. et al. Vessel adherent growth represents a major challenge in the surgical resection of neuroblastoma and is associated with adverse outcome. J. Pediatr. Surg. 54, 2336–2342 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Warmann, S. W. et al. Vascular encasement as element of risk stratification in abdominal neuroblastoma. Surg. Oncol. 20, 231–235 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Sánchez-Sánchez, Á. et al. Three-dimensional printed model and virtual reconstruction: An extra tool for pediatric solid tumors surgery. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. Rep. 6, e70–e76 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Marconi, S. et al. Value of 3D printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg. Endosc. 31, 4102–4110 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Salazar, D., Thompson, M., Rosen, A. & Zuniga, J. Using 3D printing to improve student education of complex anatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. Sci. Educ. 32, 1209–1218 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Yang, T. et al. The impact of using three-dimensional printed liver models for patient education. J. Int. Med. Res. 46, 1570–1578 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Yoon, S. et al. Personalized 3D-printed model for informed consent for stage I lung cancer: A randomized pilot trial. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 31, 316–318 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Dho, Y. S. et al. Clinical application of patient-specific 3D printing brain tumor model production system for neurosurgery. Sci. Rep. 11, 7005 (2021).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Cromeens, B. P. et al. Facilitating surgeon understanding of complex anatomy using a three-dimensional printed model. J. Surg. Res. 216, 18–25 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Tan, L. et al. Full color 3D printing of anatomical models. Clin. Anat. 35, 598–608 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Mogali, S. R. et al. Investigating the effectiveness of three-dimensionally printed anatomical models compared with plastinated human specimens in learning cardiac and neck anatomy: A randomized crossover study. Anat. Sci. Educ. 15, 1007–1017 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Kong, X. et al. Do three-dimensional visualization and three-dimensional printing improve hepatic segment anatomy teaching? A randomized controlled study. J. Surg. Educ. 73, 264–269 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Jones, D. B., Sung, R., Weinberg, C., Korelitz, T. & Andrews, R. Three-dimensional modeling may improve surgical education and clinical practice. Surg. Innov. 23, 189–195 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Hojo, D. et al. Utility of a three-dimensional printed pelvic model for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection education: A randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 229, 552-559.e3 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Martelli, N. et al. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery 159, 1485–1500 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

This research was supported by grant No. 0420202230 from the SNUH Research Fund and by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant no.: HI20C2092).

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Joong Kee Youn, Ji-Won Han, Dayoung Ko & Jeik Byun

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea

Joong Kee Youn & Hyun-Young Kim

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Sang Joon Park & Young-Hun Choi

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyunggi, Korea

Hee-Beom Yang

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

J.K.Y. and H.K. designed the study, analyzed data and wrote manuscript. S.J.P., Y.C., and J.H. performed data collection. D.K., J.B., and H.Y. analyzed the results. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscripts.

Correspondence to Hyun-Young Kim.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Youn, J.K., Park, S.J., Choi, YH. et al. Application of 3D printing technology for pre-operative evaluation, education and informed consent in pediatric retroperitoneal tumors. Sci Rep 13, 1671 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28423-4

Download citation

Received: 21 September 2022

Accepted: 18 January 2023

Published: 30 January 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28423-4

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.